Gadolinium-enhanced brain lesions in multiple sclerosis relapse.

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse by analyzing the number and location of gadolinium-enhanced (Gd+) lesions on brain MRI before methylprednisolone (MP) treatment. METHODS: We analyzed brain MRI from 90 relapsed MS patients in two Phase IV multicenter double-blind randomized clinical trials that showed the noninferiority of different routes and doses of MP administration. A 1.5- or 3-T brain MRI was performed at baseline before MP treatment and within 15 days of symptom onset. The number and location of Gd+ lesions were analyzed. Associations were studied using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of patients had at least 1 Gd+ brain lesion; the median number was 1 (interquartile range 0-4), and 41% of patients had 2 or more lesions. The most frequent location of Gd+ lesions was subcortical (41.4%). Gd+ brain lesions were found in 71.4% of patients with brainstem-cerebellum symptoms, 57.1% with spinal cord symptoms and 55.5% with optic neuritis (ON). Thirty percent of patients with brain symptoms did not have Gd+ lesions, and only 43.6% of patients had symptomatic Gd+ lesions. The univariate analysis showed a negative correlation between age and the number of Gd+ lesions (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Most patients with relapse showed several Gd+ lesions on brain MRI, even when the clinical manifestation was outside of the brain. Our findings illustrate the clinico-radiological paradox in MS relapse and support the value of brain MRI in this scenario.

Gadolinium-enhanced brain lesions in multiple sclerosis relapse / Lesiones cerebrales captantes de gadolinio en el brote de los pacientes con esclerosis múltiple

Objective: To study the clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse by analyzing the number and location of gadolinium-enhanced (Gd+) lesions on brain MRI before methylprednisolone (MP) treatment. Methods: We analyzed brain MRI from 90 relapsed MS patients in two Phase IV multicenter double-blind randomized clinical trials that showed the noninferiority of different routes and doses of MP administration. A 1.5- or 3-T brain MRI was performed at baseline before MP treatment and within 15 days of symptom onset. The number and location of Gd+ lesions were analyzed. Associations were studied using univariate analysis. Results: Sixty-two percent of patients had at least 1 Gd+ brain lesion; the median number was 1 (interquartile range 0–4), and 41% of patients had 2 or more lesions. The most frequent location of Gd+ lesions was subcortical (41.4%). Gd+ brain lesions were found in 71.4% of patients with brainstem-cerebellum symptoms, 57.1% with spinal cord symptoms and 55.5% with optic neuritis (ON). Thirty percent of patients with brain symptoms did not have Gd+ lesions, and only 43.6% of patients had symptomatic Gd+ lesions. The univariate analysis showed a negative correlation between age and the number of Gd+ lesions (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Most patients with relapse showed several Gd+ lesions on brain MRI, even when the clinical manifestation was outside of the brain. Our findings illustrate the clinico-radiological paradox in MS relapse and support the value of brain MRI in this scenario. (AU)

Objetivo: Estudiar la paradoja clínico-radiológica en el brote de la esclerosis múltiple (EM) mediante el análisis de lesiones captantes de gadolinio (Gd+) en la RM cerebral antes del tratamiento con metilprednisolona (MP). Métodos: Analizamos la RM cerebral basal de 90 pacientes con EM en brote de 2 ensayos clínicos aleatorizados multicéntricos fase IV que demostraron la no inferioridad de diferentes vías y dosis de MP, realizadas antes del tratamiento con MP y en los 15 días siguientes a la aparición de los síntomas. Se analizaron el número y la localización de las lesiones Gd+. Se estudiaron las asociaciones mediante análisis univariado. Resultados: El 62% de los pacientes tenía al menos una lesión Gd+ cerebral y el 41% de los pacientes tenía 2 o más lesiones. La localización más frecuente fue la subcortical (41,4%). Se encontraron lesiones Gd+ cerebrales en el 71,4% de los pacientes con síntomas de tronco cerebral o cerebelo, en el 57,1% con síntomas medulares y en el 55,5% con neuritis óptica. El 30% de los pacientes con síntomas cerebrales no tenían lesiones Gd+ y sólo el 4,.6% de los pacientes tenían lesiones Gd+ sintomáticas. El análisis univariante mostró una correlación negativa entre la edad y el número de lesiones Gd+ (p = 0,002). Conclusiones: La mayoría de los pacientes en brote mostraron varias lesiones Gd+ en la RM cerebral, incluso cuando la manifestación clínica fue medular u óptica. Nuestros hallazgos ilustran la paradoja clínico-radiológica en el brote de la EM y apoyan el valor de la RM cerebral en este escenario. (AU)

[Chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy: a literature review]. / Neuropatia optica inflamatoria recurrente cronica: revision de la bibliografia.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION) is an inflammatory disease characterized by painful recurrent episodes of optic neuritis with clear response to steroids and relapses with treatment withdrawal. AIMS: To performed a systematic review of the literature about CRION, since 2003 to present in medical database. We excluded pediatric or animal research articles. Search terms: CRION, chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy, recurrent optic neuritis, steroid dependent optic neuritis, and immunosuppression dependent optic neuritis. DEVELOPMENT: CRION is a relapsing optic neuritis of unknown aetiology. The strong response to corticosteroids to avoid recurrence suggests that it might be an immune-mediated disease. CRION typically presents as a subacute and recurrent optic neuropathy with severe visual loss. The principal differential diagnoses are the demyelinating (multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and anti-MOG), systemic (mostly sarcoidosis) and infectious diseases. CRION has a dramatic and dependent corticoids response; to avoid adverse events, we use immunosuppressive treatment in long-term. CONCLUSION: CRION is a rare, recurrent and cortico-dependent disease of optic nerve. An early diagnosis and accuracy treatment will improve the prognosis.

TITLE: Neuropatia optica inflamatoria recurrente cronica: revision de la bibliografia.Introduccion. La neuropatia optica inflamatoria recurrente cronica (CRION) es una enfermedad inflamatoria caracterizada por episodios recurrentes de neuritis optica dolorosa con una clara respuesta a corticoides y recaidas debido a su retirada. Objetivos. Se realiza una revision de la bibliografia sobre CRION desde 2003 hasta la actualidad en bases de datos medicas. Se excluyen articulos en edad pediatrica o de investigacion animal. Los terminos de busqueda fueron: CRION, neuritis optica, neuropatia optica inflamatoria remitente cronica, neuritis optica recurrente, neuritis optica corticodependiente y neuritis optica dependiente de inmunosupresores. Desarrollo. La CRION es una neuritis optica recurrente de etiologia no conocida. Su fuerte respuesta a corticoides, que evita las recaidas, sugiere un origen inmunomediado. La CRION se manifiesta como una neuropatia optica subaguda y recurrente con grave afectacion de la agudeza visual. Los principales diagnosticos diferenciales son las enfermedades desmielinizantes, como la esclerosis multiple, el espectro de neuromielitis optica y la enfermedad por anticuerpos anti-MOG, las enfermedades sistemicas, sobre todo la sarcoidosis, y las enfermedades infecciosas. La CRION tiene una excelente respuesta a corticoides, pero es corticodependiente; para evitar los efectos adversos de la corticoterapia se utilizan inmunosupresores a largo plazo para el tratamiento. Conclusion. La CRION es una rara enfermedad recurrente del nervio optico corticodependiente. Su reconocimiento precoz y tratamiento preciso mejoraran el pronostico.

Comparison of two high doses of oral methylprednisolone for multiple sclerosis relapses: a pilot, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Oral or intravenous methylprednisolone (≥500 mg/day for 5 days) is recommended for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Nonetheless, the optimal dose remains uncertain. We compared clinical and radiological effectiveness, safety and quality of life (QoL) of oral methylprednisolone [1250 mg/day (standard high dose)] versus 625 mg/day (lesser high dose), both for 3 days] in MS relapses. METHODS: A total of 49 patients with moderate to severe MS relapse within the previous 15 days were randomized in a pilot, double-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01986998). The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of the lesser high dose by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score improvement on day 30 (non-inferiority margin, 1 point). The secondary endpoints were EDSS score change on days 7 and 90, changes in T1 gadolinium-enhanced and new/enlarged T2 lesions on days 7 and 30, and safety and QoL results. RESULTS: The primary outcome was achieved [mean (95% confidence interval) EDSS score difference, -0.26 (-0.7 to 0.18) at 30 days (P = 0.246)]. The standard high dose yielded a superior EDSS score improvement on day 7 (P = 0.028). No differences were observed in EDSS score on day 90 (P = 0.352) or in the number of T1 gadolinium-enhanced or new/enlarged T2 lesions on day 7 (P = 0.401, 0.347) or day 30 (P = 0.349, 0.529). Safety and QoL were good at both doses. CONCLUSIONS: A lesser high-dose oral methylprednisolone regimen may not be inferior to the standard high dose in terms of clinical and radiological response.

Myelitis: Differences between multiple sclerosis and other aetiologies.

BACKGROUND: Myelitis can appear as an initial symptom in the context of demyelinating diseases, systemic inflammatory diseases, and infectious diseases. We aim to analyse the differences between myelitis associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) and myelitis resulting from other aetiologies. METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective analysis of patients with initial myelitis (2000-2013). Demographic, aetiological, clinical, radiological and prognostic variables were analysed and compared between patients with myelitis from MS and those with myelitis due to other aetiologies. RESULTS: We included 91 patients; mean follow-up was 7 years. Diagnoses were as follows: MS 57 (63%), idiopathic transverse myelitis 22 (24%), associated systemic diseases 6 (7%), and other diagnoses (6%). Myelitis due to MS was associated with younger age of onset (35 ± 11 vs. 41 ± 13; P = .02), more pronounced sphincter involvement (40.4 vs. 27.3%; P=.05), greater multifocal involvement in spinal MRI (77.2 vs. 26.5%; P=.001), shorter lesion extension (2.4 vs. 1.4 vertebral segments; P=.001), cervical location (82.5 vs. 64.7%; P=.05) and posterior location (89.5 vs. 41.2%; P=.001). Myelitis due to other aetiologies more frequently showed anterior location (47.1 vs. 24.6%; P=.02), and central cord involvement (47.1 vs. 14.1%; P=.001), with better recovery at one year of follow up (EDSS 2.0 vs. 1.5; P=.01). Multivariate analysis showed that multifocal spinal cord involvement (OR 9.38, 95% CI: 2.04-43.1) and posterior cord involvement (OR 2.16, 95% CI: 2.04-2.67) were independently associated with the diagnosis of MS. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients with an initial myelitis event will be diagnosed with MS. The presence of multifocal and posterior spinal cord lesions was significantly associated with the diagnosis of MS.